In project management for design and construction, CRS stands for Comment Resolution Sheet — the record used to track and formally close review comments on project deliverables. (Outside AEC, "CRS" can mean other things; in construction and engineering project management it is the comment resolution sheet.) It is the control that turns a pile of review comments into a managed, closable list.
Document control governs how deliverables are issued, reviewed, and approved. The CRS is the review layer of that process: when a drawing or specification is issued for review, every comment becomes a tracked entry, the author responds, and the document is only approved once all comments are closed. Without it, "reviewed" is an opinion; with it, approval is evidenced. For the full lifecycle, see What Is a Comment Resolution Sheet?
Ownership usually sits with the document controller or a designated review lead, who consolidates reviewer input into a single sheet and manages closure. Reviewers raise comments; authors respond; the lead ensures each comment is verified and closed. The one rule that protects the record: the author responding is not the same as the comment being resolved — only the reviewer closes.
Managed in a spreadsheet, the CRS depends entirely on discipline: stable IDs, honest statuses, and reviewer-only closure. As reviewer and revision counts grow, that discipline gets expensive. Contrat.io enforces it — role-based closure, permanent comment IDs, automatic carry-over between revisions, and a defensible audit trail. Try it free for 30 days, no credit card required.
In AEC and EPC project management, CRS stands for Comment Resolution Sheet — the record used to track review comments on deliverables and close them before a document is approved.
Typically the document controller or review lead, who consolidates reviewer comments and manages closure. Reviewers raise comments and authors respond, but only the reviewer closes a comment.
It keeps review comments visible until they are resolved, preventing "minor" open comments from resurfacing at commissioning or close-out where they cause costly rework and delay.
On many EPC projects, yes — the completed CRS is required as proof that every client and third-party comment was formally addressed before a document was approved for construction.